| Author |
Message |
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Incorrect/Misplaced info |
 |
|
|
lol I've been watching too much of The Office i guess
lol I've been watching too much of The Office i guess
|
|
|
 |
Posted: May 22nd, 2013, 11:11 am |
|
|
 |
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Incorrect/Misplaced info |
|
|
|
boooo ... hiss
boooo ... hiss
|
|
|
|
Posted: May 22nd, 2013, 11:09 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Incorrect/Misplaced info |
|
|
tstarnes wrote: Ok, go ahead and pull it out. That's what she said! [quote="tstarnes"]Ok, go ahead and pull it out.[/quote]
That's what she said!
|
|
|
|
Posted: May 22nd, 2013, 10:22 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Incorrect/Misplaced info |
|
|
sewixo wrote: In CMRO update 5/21/2013 Ben Parker was added to 1273: Amazing Spider-Man #112 (v1) as a flashback appearance, but this 1-panel flashback brings no new information other than existence of Ben Parker in Peter Parker's life. Shouldn't be listed there, imho. If I'm missing something, apologies. I agree with You. I removed him. [quote="sewixo"]In [url=http://cmro.travis-starnes.com/blog/2013/05/cmro-update-05212013/]CMRO update 5/21/2013[/url] Ben Parker was added to [url=http://cmro.travis-starnes.com/detail.php?idvalue=1218]1273: Amazing Spider-Man #112 (v1)[/url] as a flashback appearance, but this 1-panel flashback brings no new information other than existence of Ben Parker in Peter Parker's life. Shouldn't be listed there, imho. If I'm missing something, apologies.[/quote]
I agree with You. I removed him.
|
|
|
|
Posted: May 22nd, 2013, 4:45 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Incorrect/Misplaced info |
|
|
|
Ok, go ahead and pull it out.
Ok, go ahead and pull it out.
|
|
|
|
Posted: May 22nd, 2013, 2:51 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Incorrect/Misplaced info |
|
|
In CMRO update 5/21/2013 Ben Parker was added to 1273: Amazing Spider-Man #112 (v1) as a flashback appearance, but this 1-panel flashback brings no new information other than existence of Ben Parker in Peter Parker's life. Shouldn't be listed there, imho. If I'm missing something, apologies. In [url=http://cmro.travis-starnes.com/blog/2013/05/cmro-update-05212013/]CMRO update 5/21/2013[/url] Ben Parker was added to [url=http://cmro.travis-starnes.com/detail.php?idvalue=1218]1273: Amazing Spider-Man #112 (v1)[/url] as a flashback appearance, but this 1-panel flashback brings no new information other than existence of Ben Parker in Peter Parker's life. Shouldn't be listed there, imho. If I'm missing something, apologies.
|
|
|
|
Posted: May 22nd, 2013, 2:45 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Incorrect/Misplaced info |
|
|
|
woops. I will fix that.
woops. I will fix that.
|
|
|
|
Posted: May 21st, 2013, 1:20 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Incorrect/Misplaced info |
|
|
|
I'vew seen in the updte part that You added Deathstroke (Ultimate) and Lancelot (Ultimate). That has to be mistake because I've suggested characters by that names but not in the Ultimate Universe (cause I haven't read single issue from it).
I'vew seen in the updte part that You added Deathstroke (Ultimate) and Lancelot (Ultimate). That has to be mistake because I've suggested characters by that names but not in the Ultimate Universe (cause I haven't read single issue from it).
|
|
|
|
Posted: May 21st, 2013, 1:11 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Incorrect/Misplaced info |
|
|
You are right, I didn't think about publication dates at all. Yeah, continuity-wise, it's placed good. Maybe I overreacted  You are right, I didn't think about publication dates at all.
Yeah, continuity-wise, it's placed good. Maybe I overreacted :D
|
|
|
|
Posted: May 19th, 2013, 8:29 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Incorrect/Misplaced info |
|
|
|
@sewixo:
I've seen Your comment for Hulk 243. You can't blame them for "spoilers" because those info they gave wasn't really spoiler. Hulk 243 was printed later (in some case much much later - defenders was printed one year earlier) so all the thisngs they mentioned there already "happened" - readers knew about them.
But
to avoid suggestions like "hey. they say that hulk should be before... so move ... etc etc" I had to place hulk before defenders (Which were printed one Year earlier). I had doubts what to do but I knew something had to be done.
It's continuity nightmare, but still when they printed that issue those things already happened so it wasn't spoiler at all.
@sewixo:
I've seen Your comment for Hulk 243. You can't blame them for "spoilers" because those info they gave wasn't really spoiler. Hulk 243 was printed later (in some case much much later - defenders was printed one year earlier) so all the thisngs they mentioned there already "happened" - readers knew about them.
But
to avoid suggestions like "hey. they say that hulk should be before... so move ... etc etc" I had to place hulk before defenders (Which were printed one Year earlier). I had doubts what to do but I knew something had to be done.
It's continuity nightmare, but still when they printed that issue those things already happened so it wasn't spoiler at all.
|
|
|
|
Posted: May 19th, 2013, 2:40 am |
|
|
|
Login
Register
FAQ